Does this mean that we are more passive than active? If so, at which point will we break away from this passivity, and become producers. Sure, we are constantly making things, maybe not as much as I would like to, but almost always in vain. The absence of an audience, not including ourselves, seems to leave an immeasurable void, one that allows those more Herzogian ambitions to become limp when we ask ourselves, "How will the "thing" change from concept to object/image without the presence of another, and (as you have mentioned) without the demand for more of the same work?"
Debt Consolidation 101
-
Obligation solidification happens where one applies for a line of credit so
as to satisfy at least two existing obligations. Merging existing
unstructured ...
Aumente suas vendas de doces fazendo doações!
-
Assim que eu aprendi como fazer *bolo caseirinho* que era febre na época em
que foi lançado, eu comecei a ver resultados significantes em meu negócio e
d...
Rye from Japan
-
[from the archive, 2009 or so] We had the joy recently of experiencing
these guys from across the pacific. I was sure glad to have the
capabilities to reco...
VIII
-
take it back to the gentlemen
they're the ones who want more
dour in velvet
suppressed in lace
sniping over tea
this push
and that pull
a tangle of whispers ...
Back from the dead
-
my loves. I have been working full time finally (yay!) and have been really
absent from my blog. I am so sorry </3 it won’t happen again. I also am
getting...
Exploring by Bike
-
Today started out as just one of those days–I felt listless and irritable
about meaningless things. I spent a long time on the phone with tech help,
and sp...
-
It was just like your hand in mine
new energy
I want new and old
absolutely cannot let go
let me melt into you again
remember
what I need for me, for yo...
1 comment:
Does this mean that we are more passive than active? If so, at which point will we break away from this passivity, and become producers. Sure, we are constantly making things, maybe not as much as I would like to, but almost always in vain. The absence of an audience, not including ourselves, seems to leave an immeasurable void, one that allows those more Herzogian ambitions to become limp when we ask ourselves, "How will the "thing" change from concept to object/image without the presence of another, and (as you have mentioned) without the demand for more of the same work?"
Post a Comment